[Main Page]

Outline

From Kevin's Thesis Wiki

Main Page | Recent changes | View source | Page history | Log in / create account |

Printable version | Disclaimers | Privacy policy

Contents

Abstract

Since the late 1970’s, young people of color have created hip-hop by applying the adaptability of oral culture to consumer technologies. The tradition of spirited competition in hip-hop culture rewards innovation in sound, language, dance, and visual presentation. Unfortunately, many of these innovative practices find themselves subsumed by a totalizing view of pop music or pass by largely unseen; artifacts ephemeral and lost to history. Examining this culture of innovation reveals a technical sophistication and cultural literacy among young people of color (in particular, young males) that belies their statistical underachievement in conventional education environments. By taking advantage of the access to niche trends afforded by social-networking services, this thesis will explore three recent phenomena: the rise of the mixtape economy, the acceleration of regional dance crazes, and the unexpected deployment of pitch-correction software among hip-hop vocalists. This research will then be mobilized to consider how serious consideration of technical innovation in hip-hop culture might influence educators and affect achievement among young people of color.

Methodology, defining terms

Sources

Young black men

Hip-hop approach

Fiske's popular culture

Lessig's RO/RW distinction

Jenkin's participatory culture

Hip-hop culture

Hip-hop approach

Working def: The hip-hop approach is a way of thinking and making that accepts and refreshes old, disparate, or seemingly incongruous fragments of material culture.

Mixer example for hip-hop approach to technology, material culture

Alternate hip-hop history as told through DJs and mixtapes

The purpose of looking at mixtapes is to demonstrate how hip-hop practices shift and adapt to shifting contexts. The hip-hop-ness / hip-hop approach endures even as every material component and technique is altered. This section will be structured chronologically and utilize Lessig's four forces framework for analysis: Architecture, Law, Market, Norms

4constraints.png

Defining, framing, the "hip-hop mixtape"

Overview of the formal characteristics. This section is largely to differentiate the mixtape from the mixed-tape as written about by Moore and others.

Comparison with traditional pop album

Mixtape DJ

Party tapes (Grandmaster Flash)

Pop singles (Sugarhill Gang)

Blend tapes (Kid Capri, Ron G)

Closer analysis of Ron G "Mixes 1"

Mixtapes as street radio (DJ Clue)

Note on mainstreaming, commercialism in hip-hop

Mixtapes as demo tapes (DJ Drama/Lil Wayne)

Summarize mixtape formal elements

Use DJ Drama / Lil Wayne Dedication 2 as an example for illustrating the history of mixtapes in a single artifact

Raid on DJ Drama

Innovation in a post-mixtape era

Personal computing, hip-hop approach

Rapstation

Whoo Kid/G-Unit, 50 Cent

Lil Wayne

Brief discussion of Wayne's mixtapes between The Carter II and III.

Soulja Boy

Crank Dat phenomenon

Importance of relevance

Inventing new producerly commodities

Learning implications

Retrieved from "http://www.kevindriscoll.info/docs/thesis/wiki/Outline"

This page has been accessed 4,814 times. This page was last modified on 13 April 2009, at 12:26. Content is available under Attribution 3.0 Unported.